Henry VI, Part 3. What am I teaching my kids...the atrocities committed by power-hungry people, the personal devastation of civil war, the impending doom of evil?!!! Watching this play filled our family with many varying degrees of unsettled apprehension. Margaret is ruthless as she tortures Richard with the handkerchief from his murdered son. Her character has been slowly emerging throughout this trilogy and she is now in full power and seems to enjoy persecuting those not of her opinion. It is hard for me to understand the depth of her hatred and manipulation. Even in the end of the play when her son and husband are killed, she maintains this hatred and thinks only of herself and her loss of power. It can be dangerous to pursue our individual motives, unless we're following the Lord's will. There's another who is very happy to assist us in our efforts to obtain our motive, but in a less amiable way, to say the least. I also saw the devastation of families in the civil war between Lancaster and Yorkshire. When King Henry was watching two soldiers discover that they had each killed a member of their immediate family, he was filled with anguish, as was I. How awful it would be to fight for a cause you believe in only to have it unknowingly separate and destroy your family. At the end of the play when Richard has killed King Henry V and he decides to get rid of his brothers and become king, there is an awful foreshadowing of much more tragedy which didn't make me excited or eager to watch Richard III. If at first someone might feel sorry for Richard and his sad and deformed upbringing, at this point, that sadness has surely passed and a feeling of loathing is well under way. It is evident that he is not going to reform or change, but will seek any means to achieve full power. Another thing I learned in this play is that power is ever-changing and the only thing that's certain and unchanging in this life is how you treat others. King Henry VI was a compassionate, humble king that tried to be kind to others. He kept this character throughout the trilogy and died with a peaceful conscience; a blessing denied to others less Christ-like. This play also encouraged me to delve more into the war of the roses; a dispute which has been hard for me to understand in the lines of who's who. This play definitely raised a lot of flags for me in how I felt about evil and power and how I would handle that kind of oppression or leader. I think it's made me realize even more how important it would be to take a King Henry stance and try to be humble, always looking toward Christ. The other option is not great - kill or be killed.
At this point I have to talk about Richard III since it follows the last play. I have to give credit to Richard or Satan, for whom he's working, on his manipulation abilities. He reminds me of Iago, who, everybody thinks he's on their side when actually he's only on Iago's side. He's consumed in selfishness, but has a certain brilliance when it comes to manipulating others. This title is perfect for this play - The Tragedy of Richard III. And the tragedy happens to anyone who is remotely connected to Richard's plans for power. What a beastly time to live in England. I did enjoy all of the asides he made to the audience. We've know, throughout these last 4 plays, exactly where Richard stands. I think that's part of Shakespeare's genius and why we seem compelled to continue to delve into and learn about his characters. I also enjoyed Shakespeare's happy ending to this, otherwise, depressing play. Because everyone knows, I love happy endings. I believe and I'm very thankful that I know my life will eventually, even if it's in the 3rd act (Boyd K. Packer), have a "happily ever after."
I read Twelfth Night and thoroughly enjoyed it. I actually saved reading it until the end of the year because I like it so much. It reminds me of "Comedy of Errors" in the mix-up of identities, the ship-wreck, the love triangles, and much more... It's a fun, enjoyable comedy which puts to right all of the mishaps in the last act and everybody leaves happy and in love, well, except maybe Malvolio. Ha! Ha! And I love Viola...sweet girl.
As I read Henry IV, Part 1, I realized I should have read this play many months ago and not left it until one of the last plays. But, at least I knew what was going on for the most part. The character that stood out to me in this play was young prince Harry. I found that he had been raised in a good home, knew right from wrong, and still decided to use his agency to choose unwise situations and, ultimately, embarrassing and disappointing his family. It seemed that he walked a fine line. He didn't necessarily want to get into trouble with the law, but always justified himself in the activities he pursued to have fun. At one point he says that it will actually help his career as a king, which in my opinion, it probably does. He's very close to the people and knows their characters and situations well. Not that I'm endorsing his kind of behavior, but I do think overall it helped him to be a better king. I've known a few people like this who were wayward in their youth and yet, in their prime, when occasion called, are incredible leaders who seem to be effortlessly and inherently great.
Okay, I'd better address the sonnets. I remember reading them all and noticing that my book only had 154, as to the 156 that Shakespeare wrote. Kind of odd. Anyway, I didn't record notes for many of them. I did notice how the theme of the author changed throughout. He focuses first on her beauty, and her negligence in begetting children which would propagate her beauty. He seems all-consumed with her and thoughts of her are his life.
Timon of Athens. As I watched this play, I felt myself feeling sad for Timon and his penniless situation. He was so happy with the joviality and constancy of his friends before his bankruptcy, and seemed totally unaware of their fickleness and unfaithfulness until he needed them. Flavius, alone, stands by him and unknowingly to Timon, tries to help him out financially and emotionally. He is his one true friend, which Timon realizes at the end of the play. Beware of flattery!!! Could the lesson get any simpler in this play? Unfortunately, instead of picking himself up and pressing onward, Timon falls into an emotional trap of anger and hatred toward humanity, which did not serve him well. I thought it was interesting how quickly he learned about the falseness of his friends when the poet and the painter come to the wood to befriend themselves again to Timon. He saw right through their facades and ended up confusing them and thrusting them out of his presence. I also noticed that he never seemed to take responsibility for getting into debt. When he asked why someone didn't tell him he was running out of money, Flavius reminded him that he had told him many times but that Timon didn't listen. Also, I noticed a money theme running through this play which caused me to ponder, "What is it? What should it be used for? How should we treat it?" It was obviously very ironic when Timon finds the gold in the wood, enough gold, I'm sure, to pay off all of his creditors. Unfortunately, his emotional state was beyond repair and he discounted the blessing. I, for one, put too much emphasis on money in this life and need to remember it's just a means to an end and not the end itself. I shouldn't give it so much power in my life.
The last play I will comment on is Othello. Of all the tragedies, I enjoy this one the best, for many reasons. I admire Desdemona for her faithfulness, her amazing ability of speech, her character, basically everything about her. I do think she went overboard asking her husband to help Cassio. I could tell he was getting frustrated with her. Unfortunately, that didn't help her position of being Cassio's "friend" instead of "lover", but we all do things that irritate those around us and she, being passionate, probably just wanted to make sure he got the message. She truly loved Othello and showed her love in many ways. In Act 2, Scene 1, Iago has a conversation with Desdemona, Cassio, and Emilia. I was disgusted at how he treated his wife. You could tell that he wasn't joking when he commented on her personal attributes. He was being mean. Whenever I hear people talking badly about others, especially someone in that intimate of a relationship, a red flag pops up. Didn't anybody notice and question his integrity and character? I know that at that time in history, men could speak to their wives in a callous manner, since women were looked at as subordinate, but I still think it resonates volumes about their character. But I guess that's how good of a manipulator Iago was; nobody thought twice about it except Desdemona, who valiantly stood up for her friend. For me, the tragedy in this play is Othello's downward spiral in jealousy, mistrust, and self-doubt. I love Othello's character in the beginning. He's a war hero who is much beloved, and with very good reason. He has great integrity and leadership abilities. He is brave, kind, confident, and compassionate. Whether Desdemona marries him for his valiant past and stories or she sees him for the person that he is; he is gentle, loving, and totally confident with her in the beginning acts of the play. Unfortunately Iago puts the seed of doubt into his mind and Othello cannot focus on anything else but Desdemona's faithfulness. Iago does his work well and leads Othello by the silken thread down to his, and ultimately others', hell. This process saddens me and reminds me to always trust first and ask before assuming the worst. Hopefully, the person that we're asking is truthful and honest. I know that's why we have the gift of the spirit, to be able to decipher the truth as much as the Lord will let us. I am very grateful to have this gift for I rely on it daily.
Okay, whew!!! now that we're done, I guess there's just one question left. After reading, watching, and listening to these plays, poems, and sonnets, how has this process changed me? How has Shakespeare's works changed me? Wow! I am so not going to put in the many hours it would take to answer this question but I will just comment a little. As I grew up, because of life's circumstances, I learned to live in a bubble, my safety net from life. Through the years, I have had experiences that helped me to slowly realize that life is not always so scary and threatening and it's okay to venture out of that bubble. This year, through mentoring Shakespeare and taking on this Shakespeare challenge, has given me yet another experience that has pushed my limits on learning about and understanding humanity. Particularly, this challenge has opened my eyes to the large range of personalities, characters, agendas, and other aspects of human life that I have hitherto been reluctant to delve into. It hasn't been easy. I have always gravitated to the easy, feel-good, happy-ending stories and people in life. But it has been worth the extra strain and stress it's put upon me this year. I feel much more aware and, surprisingly, confident as I look at the world through these Shakespearean glasses I've been wearing these last 10 months. I must say "All's well that ends well." Thanks Shakespeare!
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
And even more...Shakespeare thoughts...
Just finished watching The Merry Wives of Windsor... I could not help but laugh at the pride and pompousness of Falstaff. I found myself laughing along with Mistress Page and Mistress Ford at the audacity and insincerity of his intentions. It seemed as if the characters in this play had a tight-knit community because instead of the women getting angry or offended, they choose to humiliate and poke fun at Falstaff. I especially took notice of the Ford family. Mistress Ford was very faithful and diligent in not doing anything that would harm her marriage. Mr. Ford was a very jealous man. Because of this incident, he becomes enraged and absorbed in his "supposed" marital problems. And as I have found many times in life, this trial that the Ford's went through actually brought them closer together. Mr. Ford realized that his wife loved him dearly and was committed to him, helping to abate his jealously. In fact, I think through this incident that he learned how foolish it was to be jealous, how that emotion helps no one.
In Venus and Adonis, a poem about an older woman trying to seduce a younger man, I was surprised that Adonis responded lukewarm to her advances. It seems an unusual happening to find in a Shakespeare play. I did read a little history on the poem, though, and learned that he took the story line from another source, as was so typical of Shakespeare. I wonder if he wasn't attracted to Venus or if he really just loved hunting that much. I loved the rhyme, rhythm, and literary usage in the poem, as I do all of Shakespeare's poems. The words and cadence seemed to envelope me in a frothy, airy state. Of course I was sad, at the end of the poem, when Adonis gets killed by the boar, but I didn't have too much sympathy for her as she sulks off to isolation. I really felt like she needed to find someone who appreciated her and loved her for herself. I fervently believe that there is someone for everyone and I've been in situations where I've wanted others to love me, when they weren't as passionate or as committed as I was. I understood her frustration. I've learned to take life as it comes, take what is offered, and be grateful for my blessings. Life seems much smoother and happier along the way.
Reading Lucrece wasn't as hard for me as I thought it would be. It wasn't as graphic as I had imagined Shakespeare would write it and for that I was grateful. There were a few stanzas that made an impression on me and I had to review them for a little while. One was "Pawning his honor to obtain his lust; And for himself himself he must forsake: Then where is truth, if there be no self-trust? When shall he think to find a stranger just, When he himself confounds, betrays To slanderous tongues and wretched hateful days." I seemed to find in this poem many emotions that rose to the surface within his words and dialogue. I thought it was interesting that Tarquin meditated thoroughly upon the deed he was going to do. This was no spur of the moment, lustful act. He inherently knew what was going to happen if he followed through with his desire. I think it's sad that he didn't heed his internal warnings. I wonder about his life. I'm sure he was given everything he wanted throughout his life and felt that the boundaries between right and wrong, even though he knew what they were, didn't apply to him socially. Unfortunately, at the end of the poem, we find he was wrong about that also, as his family is taken out of a leadership position and banished, which brings to the surface another truth: our actions affect others, including our family. Others will suffer or be blessed by the choices we make in this life. We are not independent entities, but are knitted together as brothers and sisters. Another stanza that gave me a great teaching opportunity with my children was "What win I, if I gain the thing I seek? A dream, a breath, a froth of fleeting joy. Who buys a minute's mirth to wail a week? Or sells eternity to get a toy? For one sweet grape who will the vine destroy?"And we know Tarquin's actions destroyed Collatinus, Lucrece, and their happy family, his own life, the life of his family, and others. The cost was huge. We find in the poem that the lustful act that he performed actually made him bitter and hateful against Lucrece, himself, and the world. We have to be so careful choosing the things that we desire. Will they create a long-lasting, eternal joy or fleeting happiness? On a much less significant scale, I think about the times when I eat junk food out of boredom, stress, or just wanting to eat something. Once the taste is gone, I'm regretful at having subjected my body to the ill effects. I feel much better about myself when I consciously choose the foods I put into my body and especially when I choose the right ones.
Romeo and Juliet. For some reason, it was extremely hard for me to get through Romeo and Juliet. I'm not sure if it's because I've read it before and watched the movie or if I have another reason. I'm not a fan of Shakespeare's tragedies (I prefer uplifting, happy story lines), but it seemed extra painful for me to read this play. I did notice this time around how much foreshadowing of death there was in everybody's speech. For example, Juliet says, "I see thee, now thou art so low, As one dead in the bottom of a tomb" in Act 3, Scene 5 and Act 2, Scene 6 records "These violent delights have violent ends." Also, I realized how much the characters rushed into decisions. The Capulet parents seemed unrestrained and quick to rage, Romeo and Juliet seem to want to rush their marriage (which may be because Paris wanted to marry Juliet quickly), and Mercutio is a prime example of rushing in headfirst without thinking of the consequences. I learned that moderation is the best course of action. I need to remind myself of this sometimes for I also am subject to that feeling of "let's get it done, and quickly!" or "being quick to anger." It's a conscious decision I make at times and when I choose moderation, the outcome always is better. I guess I always hope, in this play, that the characters and momentum will slow down, and the ending will change.
In Funeral Elegy, another of Shakespeare's poems, I found myself seeing Master John Peter's character in many people that I know and hoping I had some of the same attributes. It was a very uplifting poem, though I doubt they would have taken the time to read the whole thing at a funeral. I loved some of the phrases such as "never-blemished name", "upstanding man", "not in the waste of many idle words cared he to be heard talk", and especially, "That Christ was his." What an incredible husband and father this man was. He was a true scholar and Christian, and through his actions and well-chosen words, he achieved a grace through the silence he sometimes opted to practice. I hope that I, too, when my time comes to pass from this life, that many of the same characteristics may be remembered of me and that my love will be my legacy.
I watched Henry IV, Part 2, the BBC version, on DVD. Actually most of my family is now watching the histories. They love the battle scenes. Can you tell we are plentiful in boys? I noticed and appreciated the anguish that King Henry went through as he's worrying about the deeds of his son, Prince Hal. In this case I was glad to know that all the worrying was in vain (what worry isn't in vain?!!). Prince Hal becomes an amazing and great king, but of course his father cannot see that in the lifestyle that his son has adopted for the moment. It shows me that we need to maintain an eternal perspective, especially in the most discouraging of circumstances. Also, I found much truth in Prince Hal's decision to separate himself from his "party" friends. I've known people who have had to move and/or discontinue friendships in order to change their lifestyles. I'm not sure there is any other way to do so. Of course, the former friends do not understand and are often apt to label the person "hypocritical", but be that as it may, the separation must be made for the person to begin anew.
As I listened to Henry V, I thought it was very interesting that Shakespeare would begin with a huge, emotionally-charged battle scene. But as we arrived at the end of the CD, I realized that we had popped in the 3rd CD first. Oh my.... the anticipation faded from that story. I did gain satisfaction, though, in the great leadership abilities that King Henry V exhibited, especially gaining the confidence and thoughts of his countrymen. He really cared for them and they inherently knew that. I believe that is one of the attributes of a great leader and mentor - LOVE.
Henry VI, Part 1. This trilogy or tetrology (if you include Richard III) was an interesting series for me to watch and read. It seemed to me this king had the "bad things happen to good people" stigma. He seemed to be mild-mannered, kind, and a sympathetic leader with a life full of chaos and dissention. Maybe he was just the leader England needed to maintain some peace in such a turbulent time. When I watched this particular play, I noticed that I focused on Talbot a lot. He was an amazingly, patriotic speaker and leader. His speeches are stirring and powerful. The English were very lucky to have him leading their army. I was very sad towards the end of the play when his son, John, comes to help in a battle and is killed. Talbot is devastated and dies quickly afterward. It was heart-breaking to see him so tough in battle and steadfast to his loyal purposes and then die at the end as love conquers him.
Henry VI, Part 2. There is so much political backstabbing and conflict in this play. It gave me a great understanding of how fragile people's positions were in England's monarchy, especially during this time. I felt so sad for Henry as the personality and character of his wife, Margaret, emerges even more passionately and clearly in this play. It must have been hard for him to maintain control of the his country during this time, but to also have a wife with opposite opinions throughout his reign, must have made it extremely challenging and frustrating. It is so important to maintain unity as a husband and wife. I know that as my husband and I have had differences, a chasm sometimes arises that threatens to split the whole family. That is exactly what happened to England at this time. I thought it was very interesting at the end of the play when Suffolk is captured and behead that he maintained that he was a "great" and "noble" man. Could he not see the hypocrisy in that statement? Did he really not have a clue how evil and malignant his character was? I causes me to imagine...how do we see ourselves in the light of truth? How is that achieved? Oftentimes our own view of ourselves is much different than the views of others. Sometimes that view is not easily reconciled and sometimes it cannot be in this world.
In Venus and Adonis, a poem about an older woman trying to seduce a younger man, I was surprised that Adonis responded lukewarm to her advances. It seems an unusual happening to find in a Shakespeare play. I did read a little history on the poem, though, and learned that he took the story line from another source, as was so typical of Shakespeare. I wonder if he wasn't attracted to Venus or if he really just loved hunting that much. I loved the rhyme, rhythm, and literary usage in the poem, as I do all of Shakespeare's poems. The words and cadence seemed to envelope me in a frothy, airy state. Of course I was sad, at the end of the poem, when Adonis gets killed by the boar, but I didn't have too much sympathy for her as she sulks off to isolation. I really felt like she needed to find someone who appreciated her and loved her for herself. I fervently believe that there is someone for everyone and I've been in situations where I've wanted others to love me, when they weren't as passionate or as committed as I was. I understood her frustration. I've learned to take life as it comes, take what is offered, and be grateful for my blessings. Life seems much smoother and happier along the way.
Reading Lucrece wasn't as hard for me as I thought it would be. It wasn't as graphic as I had imagined Shakespeare would write it and for that I was grateful. There were a few stanzas that made an impression on me and I had to review them for a little while. One was "Pawning his honor to obtain his lust; And for himself himself he must forsake: Then where is truth, if there be no self-trust? When shall he think to find a stranger just, When he himself confounds, betrays To slanderous tongues and wretched hateful days." I seemed to find in this poem many emotions that rose to the surface within his words and dialogue. I thought it was interesting that Tarquin meditated thoroughly upon the deed he was going to do. This was no spur of the moment, lustful act. He inherently knew what was going to happen if he followed through with his desire. I think it's sad that he didn't heed his internal warnings. I wonder about his life. I'm sure he was given everything he wanted throughout his life and felt that the boundaries between right and wrong, even though he knew what they were, didn't apply to him socially. Unfortunately, at the end of the poem, we find he was wrong about that also, as his family is taken out of a leadership position and banished, which brings to the surface another truth: our actions affect others, including our family. Others will suffer or be blessed by the choices we make in this life. We are not independent entities, but are knitted together as brothers and sisters. Another stanza that gave me a great teaching opportunity with my children was "What win I, if I gain the thing I seek? A dream, a breath, a froth of fleeting joy. Who buys a minute's mirth to wail a week? Or sells eternity to get a toy? For one sweet grape who will the vine destroy?"And we know Tarquin's actions destroyed Collatinus, Lucrece, and their happy family, his own life, the life of his family, and others. The cost was huge. We find in the poem that the lustful act that he performed actually made him bitter and hateful against Lucrece, himself, and the world. We have to be so careful choosing the things that we desire. Will they create a long-lasting, eternal joy or fleeting happiness? On a much less significant scale, I think about the times when I eat junk food out of boredom, stress, or just wanting to eat something. Once the taste is gone, I'm regretful at having subjected my body to the ill effects. I feel much better about myself when I consciously choose the foods I put into my body and especially when I choose the right ones.
Romeo and Juliet. For some reason, it was extremely hard for me to get through Romeo and Juliet. I'm not sure if it's because I've read it before and watched the movie or if I have another reason. I'm not a fan of Shakespeare's tragedies (I prefer uplifting, happy story lines), but it seemed extra painful for me to read this play. I did notice this time around how much foreshadowing of death there was in everybody's speech. For example, Juliet says, "I see thee, now thou art so low, As one dead in the bottom of a tomb" in Act 3, Scene 5 and Act 2, Scene 6 records "These violent delights have violent ends." Also, I realized how much the characters rushed into decisions. The Capulet parents seemed unrestrained and quick to rage, Romeo and Juliet seem to want to rush their marriage (which may be because Paris wanted to marry Juliet quickly), and Mercutio is a prime example of rushing in headfirst without thinking of the consequences. I learned that moderation is the best course of action. I need to remind myself of this sometimes for I also am subject to that feeling of "let's get it done, and quickly!" or "being quick to anger." It's a conscious decision I make at times and when I choose moderation, the outcome always is better. I guess I always hope, in this play, that the characters and momentum will slow down, and the ending will change.
In Funeral Elegy, another of Shakespeare's poems, I found myself seeing Master John Peter's character in many people that I know and hoping I had some of the same attributes. It was a very uplifting poem, though I doubt they would have taken the time to read the whole thing at a funeral. I loved some of the phrases such as "never-blemished name", "upstanding man", "not in the waste of many idle words cared he to be heard talk", and especially, "That Christ was his." What an incredible husband and father this man was. He was a true scholar and Christian, and through his actions and well-chosen words, he achieved a grace through the silence he sometimes opted to practice. I hope that I, too, when my time comes to pass from this life, that many of the same characteristics may be remembered of me and that my love will be my legacy.
I watched Henry IV, Part 2, the BBC version, on DVD. Actually most of my family is now watching the histories. They love the battle scenes. Can you tell we are plentiful in boys? I noticed and appreciated the anguish that King Henry went through as he's worrying about the deeds of his son, Prince Hal. In this case I was glad to know that all the worrying was in vain (what worry isn't in vain?!!). Prince Hal becomes an amazing and great king, but of course his father cannot see that in the lifestyle that his son has adopted for the moment. It shows me that we need to maintain an eternal perspective, especially in the most discouraging of circumstances. Also, I found much truth in Prince Hal's decision to separate himself from his "party" friends. I've known people who have had to move and/or discontinue friendships in order to change their lifestyles. I'm not sure there is any other way to do so. Of course, the former friends do not understand and are often apt to label the person "hypocritical", but be that as it may, the separation must be made for the person to begin anew.
As I listened to Henry V, I thought it was very interesting that Shakespeare would begin with a huge, emotionally-charged battle scene. But as we arrived at the end of the CD, I realized that we had popped in the 3rd CD first. Oh my.... the anticipation faded from that story. I did gain satisfaction, though, in the great leadership abilities that King Henry V exhibited, especially gaining the confidence and thoughts of his countrymen. He really cared for them and they inherently knew that. I believe that is one of the attributes of a great leader and mentor - LOVE.
Henry VI, Part 1. This trilogy or tetrology (if you include Richard III) was an interesting series for me to watch and read. It seemed to me this king had the "bad things happen to good people" stigma. He seemed to be mild-mannered, kind, and a sympathetic leader with a life full of chaos and dissention. Maybe he was just the leader England needed to maintain some peace in such a turbulent time. When I watched this particular play, I noticed that I focused on Talbot a lot. He was an amazingly, patriotic speaker and leader. His speeches are stirring and powerful. The English were very lucky to have him leading their army. I was very sad towards the end of the play when his son, John, comes to help in a battle and is killed. Talbot is devastated and dies quickly afterward. It was heart-breaking to see him so tough in battle and steadfast to his loyal purposes and then die at the end as love conquers him.
Henry VI, Part 2. There is so much political backstabbing and conflict in this play. It gave me a great understanding of how fragile people's positions were in England's monarchy, especially during this time. I felt so sad for Henry as the personality and character of his wife, Margaret, emerges even more passionately and clearly in this play. It must have been hard for him to maintain control of the his country during this time, but to also have a wife with opposite opinions throughout his reign, must have made it extremely challenging and frustrating. It is so important to maintain unity as a husband and wife. I know that as my husband and I have had differences, a chasm sometimes arises that threatens to split the whole family. That is exactly what happened to England at this time. I thought it was very interesting at the end of the play when Suffolk is captured and behead that he maintained that he was a "great" and "noble" man. Could he not see the hypocrisy in that statement? Did he really not have a clue how evil and malignant his character was? I causes me to imagine...how do we see ourselves in the light of truth? How is that achieved? Oftentimes our own view of ourselves is much different than the views of others. Sometimes that view is not easily reconciled and sometimes it cannot be in this world.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
...and yet more Shakespeare...
Love's Labour Lost. Now there's a great play to listen to and to laugh with. As Shakespeare expertly begins this play with 3 friends making a vow to uphold a rigid list of rules for 3 years, who would guess that within the "day?" all three are already compromising their dedication to those rules. The play continued to draw laughs from me as King Ferdinand and his attending Lords attempt to woo the French princess and her attending ladies as Russian suitors. The women think that they have come to mock them and turn the tables on them by disguising themselves. The wooing ends really badly; the joke being on the three young men, a.k.a. the Russian suitors. Through misplaced love letters and deliberately-misguided masquerade balls, the play finally concludes with the young women taking charge of the situation: they decide that they will come back in a year and marry the young men if the young men will dedicate their lives for 1 year to study. It would be interesting what Shakespeare would have written as a sequel. What a fun play that would be to write. Ah, well...sometime in the future?!!
I also listened to Much Ado about Nothing. This play emphasized to me the importance of treating others kindly. I didn't elaborate on my notes so I'll have to go by memory on this one. When Timbrero (duped into witnessing a false scene orchestrated by Girondo who's jealous of their relationship) accuses Fenicia of being unfaithful, she faints and her father pronounces her dead. Because of Girondo's actions, and others in life who believe that if they're miserable everyone else should be, happiness was nearly thwarted. Even when it may seem impossible to believe the truth, I hope that we would exercise faith and trust in those we love, and listen less to those around us who might not have our best interests at heart. This happened to me when I became engaged to my husband. There were a few who did their best to talk me out of it and split us up but I persevered, went with my heart, and we've enjoyed 15 years of, more than less, happy times. I also thought of Othello when I listened to this play and how he, by listening to Iago, destroyed everything he loved.
Listening to the Winter's Tale, I found myself examining loyalty, especially in the relationship between Polixenes (King of Bohemia) and Camillo (King Leontes's Lord), Queen Hermione and Paulina (wife of Antigonus, a Sicilian Lord), and Prince Florizel and Perdita. Camillo and Paulina showed exemplary courage when they displayed loyalty for truth. Camillo didn't even any ties to Polixenes, but he knew the king was in the wrong, and stood up for truth. He also stayed loyal to Polixenes by serving him many years after the accusation, even though he was pining for Sicily. Paulina stayed loyal to the queen, even at the peril of her own life. And the young lovers stayed true to themselves and their relationship even when Polixenes took away money, title, and was threatening to them. I realized that there's all kinds of loyalty and we need to embrace them all, as they lead to truth.
Listening again, this time to As you like it. I also thought this was a great play about how we should respond to adversity and how to treat others. The Duke, living without anger in banishment, and Rosalind and Celia, seemed to be of such great character in spite of the circumstances they are wrongly thrust into. I was impressed so much as to think of our Lord, Jesus Christ, and the way he handled abuse and disgrace. He was humble, kind, forgiving, and loving. These are the very attributes that these three characters portrayed in this play and I enjoyed learning about them and I especially loved the ending when the righteous win the day.
I noticed at one point in the play when Rosalind is talking to Orlando about how men and women change after marriage how true it is of human nature that when we're afraid of getting hurt, we sometimes say things that we don't mean, as she did. Unfortunately, fear can sway us off the perfect path of truth. I hope that I can be better at saying the things I mean and feel, not just the reactions that come to mind in a situation such as that.
I watched Troilus and Cressida and didn't enjoy the movie very much. I'm not much for Shakespearean tragedies. I watch movies to "see the sunny side of life" so tragedy is hard for me to get through. That said, I loved Troilus comment in the beginning of the play to Pandarus. "When I do tell thee, there my hopes lie drown'd. Reply not in how many fathoms deep." I thought that line was hilarious. Do we do that sometimes? Wallow with someone else in their despair and take them further in to the depths? I hope not, but it's worth pondering... I did admire and respect Troilus, also, as he leaves Cressida (once he realizes she's betrayed their marriage) and doesn't look back. It takes a lot of courage and self worth to take the higher road and move on.
Another tragedy...Cymbeline...and another play in which the desire of Satan is examined, that is, if he is in misery, he wishes everybody to be in misery. In another Iago and Girondo role, Iachimo tries to persuade Posthumus that Imogen, like all other women, will not stay faithful to her agreement with him. He is not able to convince Posthumus, though, until Iachimo shows him the bracelet he stole from her room. Posthumus is devastated and orders to have Imogen killed. He regrets that act and from thenceforth cares nothing for life, even to the point wherein he gives himself up as a prisoner. In the end, Posthumus and Imogen are reunited and Iachimo announces his deception. The one thing I find interesting about Shakepeare's plays are that when someone says that they're sorry and ask forgiveness, they are frankly forgiven and are usually friends afterward. It seems so quick and easy, like it's supposed to be, but hardly like what it feels like to forgive sometimes.
In watching Coriolanus, I was amazed at the journey that Coriolanus, formerly Caius Martius, took. He intensely dislikes the lower class and so when he asks for their vote, after becoming a war hero and part of the Senate, and they reject him (admittedly by two other people conspiring against him). I don't feel sorry for him at all. I think he brought it on himself. It just gets worse for him as he defects to Rome's enemy, and attacks Rome. He ceases the attack only when his mother pleads for the city. He returns to Antium and is declared a traitor because he did not take Rome. In the end he's assassinated. What a life! And what anger can do to it...helping to make foolish and rash decisions.
Another video I watched was King John. I'm thinking this is the play that I researched in more depth and unless I'm thinking of another, I was amazed at how close to the true history Shakespeare wrote this. I was saddened by Arthur's sad plight. He was rescued by Hubert, feeling compassionate by the boy's innocence, and then ends his life by leaping off of a castle wall, thinking he could flee England, and falling to his death.
In watching Antony and Cleopatra, I pondered a lot on our emotions and the correct way to portray them. Antony and Cleopatra both seemed so apt to passionate behavior which led to a dramatic end for both of them. At one point, it seems as if Cleopatra does this for show, because as soon as she makes her point, she chooses a new emotion, a calmer one, which makes me wonder how often emotion is used to manipulate. Antony does this also to Cleopatra as he condemns her at one point in the video and then promptly forgives her. I, like them, tend to be passionate and am continually working to have more self-control. I am very aware of when I have the spirit and when I don't and when I am passionate, I feel it leave. Of course, that's when I am passionately angry. When I'm passionate about something I'm learning or about something I'm sharing, I feel the spirit increase.
I watched Macbeth at our local college just a few weeks ago. The story was just as I remembered it to be. I read the play a few months ago. It was dark and evil which is exactly what you conjure up when you deal with spirits on the other side. The actor who portrayed Macbeth was fabulous in his character progression. I found myself liking him at first, he seemed honorable and noble. It was fascinating to watch him descend into lower and lower emotions, conversations, and physical appearance. The moral that always pops into my head about Macbeth is be careful who you turn to for inspiration. The reality is that there is good and there is evil in our world. We have to be careful to always choose the right. The middle road is an easy way for the devil to slowly lead us down to hell. I enjoyed immensely the civil-war era and the Southern accents that accompanied this play.
I also listened to Much Ado about Nothing. This play emphasized to me the importance of treating others kindly. I didn't elaborate on my notes so I'll have to go by memory on this one. When Timbrero (duped into witnessing a false scene orchestrated by Girondo who's jealous of their relationship) accuses Fenicia of being unfaithful, she faints and her father pronounces her dead. Because of Girondo's actions, and others in life who believe that if they're miserable everyone else should be, happiness was nearly thwarted. Even when it may seem impossible to believe the truth, I hope that we would exercise faith and trust in those we love, and listen less to those around us who might not have our best interests at heart. This happened to me when I became engaged to my husband. There were a few who did their best to talk me out of it and split us up but I persevered, went with my heart, and we've enjoyed 15 years of, more than less, happy times. I also thought of Othello when I listened to this play and how he, by listening to Iago, destroyed everything he loved.
Listening to the Winter's Tale, I found myself examining loyalty, especially in the relationship between Polixenes (King of Bohemia) and Camillo (King Leontes's Lord), Queen Hermione and Paulina (wife of Antigonus, a Sicilian Lord), and Prince Florizel and Perdita. Camillo and Paulina showed exemplary courage when they displayed loyalty for truth. Camillo didn't even any ties to Polixenes, but he knew the king was in the wrong, and stood up for truth. He also stayed loyal to Polixenes by serving him many years after the accusation, even though he was pining for Sicily. Paulina stayed loyal to the queen, even at the peril of her own life. And the young lovers stayed true to themselves and their relationship even when Polixenes took away money, title, and was threatening to them. I realized that there's all kinds of loyalty and we need to embrace them all, as they lead to truth.
Listening again, this time to As you like it. I also thought this was a great play about how we should respond to adversity and how to treat others. The Duke, living without anger in banishment, and Rosalind and Celia, seemed to be of such great character in spite of the circumstances they are wrongly thrust into. I was impressed so much as to think of our Lord, Jesus Christ, and the way he handled abuse and disgrace. He was humble, kind, forgiving, and loving. These are the very attributes that these three characters portrayed in this play and I enjoyed learning about them and I especially loved the ending when the righteous win the day.
I noticed at one point in the play when Rosalind is talking to Orlando about how men and women change after marriage how true it is of human nature that when we're afraid of getting hurt, we sometimes say things that we don't mean, as she did. Unfortunately, fear can sway us off the perfect path of truth. I hope that I can be better at saying the things I mean and feel, not just the reactions that come to mind in a situation such as that.
I watched Troilus and Cressida and didn't enjoy the movie very much. I'm not much for Shakespearean tragedies. I watch movies to "see the sunny side of life" so tragedy is hard for me to get through. That said, I loved Troilus comment in the beginning of the play to Pandarus. "When I do tell thee, there my hopes lie drown'd. Reply not in how many fathoms deep." I thought that line was hilarious. Do we do that sometimes? Wallow with someone else in their despair and take them further in to the depths? I hope not, but it's worth pondering... I did admire and respect Troilus, also, as he leaves Cressida (once he realizes she's betrayed their marriage) and doesn't look back. It takes a lot of courage and self worth to take the higher road and move on.
Another tragedy...Cymbeline...and another play in which the desire of Satan is examined, that is, if he is in misery, he wishes everybody to be in misery. In another Iago and Girondo role, Iachimo tries to persuade Posthumus that Imogen, like all other women, will not stay faithful to her agreement with him. He is not able to convince Posthumus, though, until Iachimo shows him the bracelet he stole from her room. Posthumus is devastated and orders to have Imogen killed. He regrets that act and from thenceforth cares nothing for life, even to the point wherein he gives himself up as a prisoner. In the end, Posthumus and Imogen are reunited and Iachimo announces his deception. The one thing I find interesting about Shakepeare's plays are that when someone says that they're sorry and ask forgiveness, they are frankly forgiven and are usually friends afterward. It seems so quick and easy, like it's supposed to be, but hardly like what it feels like to forgive sometimes.
In watching Coriolanus, I was amazed at the journey that Coriolanus, formerly Caius Martius, took. He intensely dislikes the lower class and so when he asks for their vote, after becoming a war hero and part of the Senate, and they reject him (admittedly by two other people conspiring against him). I don't feel sorry for him at all. I think he brought it on himself. It just gets worse for him as he defects to Rome's enemy, and attacks Rome. He ceases the attack only when his mother pleads for the city. He returns to Antium and is declared a traitor because he did not take Rome. In the end he's assassinated. What a life! And what anger can do to it...helping to make foolish and rash decisions.
Another video I watched was King John. I'm thinking this is the play that I researched in more depth and unless I'm thinking of another, I was amazed at how close to the true history Shakespeare wrote this. I was saddened by Arthur's sad plight. He was rescued by Hubert, feeling compassionate by the boy's innocence, and then ends his life by leaping off of a castle wall, thinking he could flee England, and falling to his death.
In watching Antony and Cleopatra, I pondered a lot on our emotions and the correct way to portray them. Antony and Cleopatra both seemed so apt to passionate behavior which led to a dramatic end for both of them. At one point, it seems as if Cleopatra does this for show, because as soon as she makes her point, she chooses a new emotion, a calmer one, which makes me wonder how often emotion is used to manipulate. Antony does this also to Cleopatra as he condemns her at one point in the video and then promptly forgives her. I, like them, tend to be passionate and am continually working to have more self-control. I am very aware of when I have the spirit and when I don't and when I am passionate, I feel it leave. Of course, that's when I am passionately angry. When I'm passionate about something I'm learning or about something I'm sharing, I feel the spirit increase.
I watched Macbeth at our local college just a few weeks ago. The story was just as I remembered it to be. I read the play a few months ago. It was dark and evil which is exactly what you conjure up when you deal with spirits on the other side. The actor who portrayed Macbeth was fabulous in his character progression. I found myself liking him at first, he seemed honorable and noble. It was fascinating to watch him descend into lower and lower emotions, conversations, and physical appearance. The moral that always pops into my head about Macbeth is be careful who you turn to for inspiration. The reality is that there is good and there is evil in our world. We have to be careful to always choose the right. The middle road is an easy way for the devil to slowly lead us down to hell. I enjoyed immensely the civil-war era and the Southern accents that accompanied this play.
Monday, October 5, 2009
More thoughts on Shakespeare
Well, I totally understand why "All's Well That Ends Well" is a problem play. What a heap of hogwash! I know Helena loves Bertram, but really, could she still desire him even after he so blatantly disregards her and has relations with another woman (so he thinks!!!)? I do have some sympathy for Bertram being forced into a marriage he does not want and I respect him for not solemnizing his marriage vows when he easily could have taken advantage of Helena but the lack of his accountability and responsibility for his actions at the end of the play cause a "problem" for me. He gets off scott free! Does he really love Helena now or is it just a ploy to get out of a sticky situation? I guess being on the more distrustful side of humanity, I would wonder. I do wish them much love and success though. With a wife like Helena, a man could become a wonderful figure. Such is the greatness of her love.
I listened to the audio of "Comedy of Errors" this past week. I've seen this play a few times and consequently knew the storyline. I was pleased with the audio for two reasons: First, I was able to feel more immersed in the play and to feel a part of it. My imagination and recent memories of the movie helped to make the humorous parts more funny and the heartache more real. Through listening, I seemed to feel more emotion for the characters. Second, I was able to hear the play in its entirety, which I hadn't been able to do previously. I am sure the directors have a hard time deciding where to cut the lines. The whole play is so rich with wit, humor, and intrigue. I appreciate this play for the fact that it reminds me not to assume anything and to question everything; to seek original references with the Holy Spirit as my companion.
A Lover's Complaint
This poem, written in rhyme royal, was enjoyable to listen to and internalize as I read it to my little ones lounging around me, their bright, flame-reflected faces upturned to mine. The warmth emanating from our darkened wood stove lent a softness to the woman's grief as we, companions with the aged man, listened to her story alongside the gurgling brook . Two lines caught my attention throughout this story of broken trust. "All melting; though our drops this difference bore, His poison'd me, and mine did him restore." This line brought much sadness to me as I could visualize her disappointed disgrace contrasted with his conceited, cheerful attitude made possible by a conquest of goodness. I had a friend once who could call this complaint her own. She was the most beautiful woman I've ever met, inside and out. She, like the lover in Shakespeare's poem, had admirer's abound, but she, also, wanted but one man, and that man didn't keep a true heart for her. He rebuked her, reviled her, toyed with her, and disgraced her. She continued to love him in spite of these hardships. I moved away and lost touch with her, but I wonder still...are they together? Did she find a good man to love her? I wonder...and I pray for her.
Julius Caesar
I enjoyed the intrigue and fast-moving pace of this play. I thought at first Cassius wicked, which through perusal of commentaries, I found myself changing that label to "concerned" instead. I was sad to see Brutus take the path that he did. He seemed very naive and trusting which I thought might be a tragic flaw for him. I kept wondering throughout the play, isn't there a better way? Can't he do something else in this precarious position? What should we do? Our society is so closely mirrored with Rome's at that time. What is the correct course that we should take? What do we do to reverse the power-hungry government that we've allowed to malignantly grow? I also it was very interesting and disturbing how the citizens reacted to the upheaval. They seemed to be quickly swayed by and susceptible to the powerful speeches, unable to think for themselves. Another alarming comparison...
2 Gentlemen of Verona
"Who by repentance is not satisfied Is nor of heaven, nor earth; for these are pleas'd; By penitence the Eternal wrath's appeas'd,-" Wow, Valentine, talk about forgiving as Christ would forgive. Of course it might be easier now that he has Silvia in his arms, but still...he frankly forgave Proteus for his betrayal and deception in his behalf. I wonder at Proteus's repentance. Was it sincere or did he just get caught and talk his way out of it. I'm realizing this a common theme among Shakespeare's plays, one which continues to raise the red flag of "trust" for me. I realize that it's not up to me to "judge" if someone's sincere or not, I still need to forgive, as Valentine so eloquently reminds us. I hope I can be more trusting of others and remember that most people are trying their best in their own specific situations. To them and the rest, I leave judgment to the heavens and improving Christ-like qualities to myself.
I listened to the audio of "Comedy of Errors" this past week. I've seen this play a few times and consequently knew the storyline. I was pleased with the audio for two reasons: First, I was able to feel more immersed in the play and to feel a part of it. My imagination and recent memories of the movie helped to make the humorous parts more funny and the heartache more real. Through listening, I seemed to feel more emotion for the characters. Second, I was able to hear the play in its entirety, which I hadn't been able to do previously. I am sure the directors have a hard time deciding where to cut the lines. The whole play is so rich with wit, humor, and intrigue. I appreciate this play for the fact that it reminds me not to assume anything and to question everything; to seek original references with the Holy Spirit as my companion.
A Lover's Complaint
This poem, written in rhyme royal, was enjoyable to listen to and internalize as I read it to my little ones lounging around me, their bright, flame-reflected faces upturned to mine. The warmth emanating from our darkened wood stove lent a softness to the woman's grief as we, companions with the aged man, listened to her story alongside the gurgling brook . Two lines caught my attention throughout this story of broken trust. "All melting; though our drops this difference bore, His poison'd me, and mine did him restore." This line brought much sadness to me as I could visualize her disappointed disgrace contrasted with his conceited, cheerful attitude made possible by a conquest of goodness. I had a friend once who could call this complaint her own. She was the most beautiful woman I've ever met, inside and out. She, like the lover in Shakespeare's poem, had admirer's abound, but she, also, wanted but one man, and that man didn't keep a true heart for her. He rebuked her, reviled her, toyed with her, and disgraced her. She continued to love him in spite of these hardships. I moved away and lost touch with her, but I wonder still...are they together? Did she find a good man to love her? I wonder...and I pray for her.
Julius Caesar
I enjoyed the intrigue and fast-moving pace of this play. I thought at first Cassius wicked, which through perusal of commentaries, I found myself changing that label to "concerned" instead. I was sad to see Brutus take the path that he did. He seemed very naive and trusting which I thought might be a tragic flaw for him. I kept wondering throughout the play, isn't there a better way? Can't he do something else in this precarious position? What should we do? Our society is so closely mirrored with Rome's at that time. What is the correct course that we should take? What do we do to reverse the power-hungry government that we've allowed to malignantly grow? I also it was very interesting and disturbing how the citizens reacted to the upheaval. They seemed to be quickly swayed by and susceptible to the powerful speeches, unable to think for themselves. Another alarming comparison...
2 Gentlemen of Verona
"Who by repentance is not satisfied Is nor of heaven, nor earth; for these are pleas'd; By penitence the Eternal wrath's appeas'd,-" Wow, Valentine, talk about forgiving as Christ would forgive. Of course it might be easier now that he has Silvia in his arms, but still...he frankly forgave Proteus for his betrayal and deception in his behalf. I wonder at Proteus's repentance. Was it sincere or did he just get caught and talk his way out of it. I'm realizing this a common theme among Shakespeare's plays, one which continues to raise the red flag of "trust" for me. I realize that it's not up to me to "judge" if someone's sincere or not, I still need to forgive, as Valentine so eloquently reminds us. I hope I can be more trusting of others and remember that most people are trying their best in their own specific situations. To them and the rest, I leave judgment to the heavens and improving Christ-like qualities to myself.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Shakespearean mentor challenge
I'm going to attempt to explain a few of my thoughts on these plays, sonnets, and poems by Shakespeare. I figure I need to jot down at least a few ideas to help me recollect later on down the road. Plus, I might discover the answers to my questions someday and wouldn't it be sad if I couldn't remember them, the questions, I mean. Anyway, I might do these in batches. It might be easier for me to make the writing commitment.
The Merchant of Venice - I enjoyed reading this book and found I was underlining text and taking notes in the margins. The only problem with that was that I had a library edition. Oops!!! Being the good citizen that I am, I erased all of the marks (good thing I write softly). I was drawn to Portia's "mercy" plea for Antonio. I actually used it in one of our Shakespeare Conquest lectures contrasting the verse with prose, "Don't be so hard on him." It's been one of my most successful lectures. Another thought I had was about Shylock. If he had received Antonio's "pound of flesh", what kind of man would he have become? Would he have changed from his revengeful state? Not likely, since revenge rarely douses anger and outrage, but instead festers into a hateful state. I think Bassanio has a lot of learning to pursue in order to equal Portia, but then again, maybe, just being by her side, by osmosis, he'll acquire the knowledge required. As it stands, Portia is obviously pleased with his good looks and character. Maybe he's just what she needs.
Sonnets 1-4,5-9 - Okay, I need to look up commentary for these verses. It sounds to me like the author is trying to seduce a virtuous woman. Not a very honorable beginning...
Measure for Measure - I watched this BBC version and thought it was great! I loved how Isabel desired to stayed pure and virtuous, even when her own brother, Claudio, begged her to give into Angelo's request. The Duke was also a favorite character of mine and I appreciated his timing wherein, concealed as a friar, he saved Isabel from further distress by sending Mariana to go in her stead to meet Angelo in the darkened garden. He proved himself witty, charming, and resourceful. I did feel sorrow for Mariana at the end of the play when she, herself being joyful about the situation, married Angelo and began their life together. I cannot fathom her joy knowing all of the horrible deeds he has done and I hope, for her sake, he changes since his punishment seems only to be marriage to a lovely and virtuous woman. I was thankful Isabel was able to retain her virtue throughout the play and had the opportunity of an honorable and true love with the Duke. This play inspired me to choose worthy and righteous friends who uplift and support me in the endeavors that I pursue, and I hope to be a more worthy and true friend to them in return.
Titus Andronicus - This was a hard play for me to listen to. I'm glad we didn't have to view a video. I was amazed at how much I picked up just listening to the CD. I didn't enjoy the human sacrifice of Tamora's son in the beginning of the play. I found I didn't like Titus from the get-go, though it make me ponder on the evil and horrific nature of war where it seems really nobody wins. Tamora's underlying plot of revenge was very distasteful also, especially when she helps her other two sons rape and mutilate Lavinia. I would hope, if I was in a similar situation, that I would not take her path of revenge and lose the companionship of the Almighty. I was not sad at the end when she was killed and her body was left for the beasts and birds, although I did feel sorrow for her being in the terrible situation of a prisoner of war to begin with. Titus
Pericles, Prince of Tyre - I also watched the BBC version for this play and really enjoyed it! It was listed as a comedy on the DVD and is listed as a tragedy through LEMI. I, myself, would gravitate toward listing it as a comedy. Although each character, especially Pericles and his daughter, Marina, had much tragedy in their lives, they were both reunited with their wife/mother at the end of the play with much rejoicing. No one was seriously hurt in the play; even Mariana within the Brothel wittingly kept her virtue intact while converting those who would despoil her to goodness and honor. Mariana was obviously raised with the best education and character possible, not in thanks to her envious adopted mother, and I'm glad that education assisted in keeping her pure and undefiled. This play inspired me to seek the higher ground when in dangerous or awkward situations and I found myself hoping that my increasing education will assist me when I am in need.
'Til next time,
Nikki
The Merchant of Venice - I enjoyed reading this book and found I was underlining text and taking notes in the margins. The only problem with that was that I had a library edition. Oops!!! Being the good citizen that I am, I erased all of the marks (good thing I write softly). I was drawn to Portia's "mercy" plea for Antonio. I actually used it in one of our Shakespeare Conquest lectures contrasting the verse with prose, "Don't be so hard on him." It's been one of my most successful lectures. Another thought I had was about Shylock. If he had received Antonio's "pound of flesh", what kind of man would he have become? Would he have changed from his revengeful state? Not likely, since revenge rarely douses anger and outrage, but instead festers into a hateful state. I think Bassanio has a lot of learning to pursue in order to equal Portia, but then again, maybe, just being by her side, by osmosis, he'll acquire the knowledge required. As it stands, Portia is obviously pleased with his good looks and character. Maybe he's just what she needs.
Sonnets 1-4,5-9 - Okay, I need to look up commentary for these verses. It sounds to me like the author is trying to seduce a virtuous woman. Not a very honorable beginning...
Measure for Measure - I watched this BBC version and thought it was great! I loved how Isabel desired to stayed pure and virtuous, even when her own brother, Claudio, begged her to give into Angelo's request. The Duke was also a favorite character of mine and I appreciated his timing wherein, concealed as a friar, he saved Isabel from further distress by sending Mariana to go in her stead to meet Angelo in the darkened garden. He proved himself witty, charming, and resourceful. I did feel sorrow for Mariana at the end of the play when she, herself being joyful about the situation, married Angelo and began their life together. I cannot fathom her joy knowing all of the horrible deeds he has done and I hope, for her sake, he changes since his punishment seems only to be marriage to a lovely and virtuous woman. I was thankful Isabel was able to retain her virtue throughout the play and had the opportunity of an honorable and true love with the Duke. This play inspired me to choose worthy and righteous friends who uplift and support me in the endeavors that I pursue, and I hope to be a more worthy and true friend to them in return.
Titus Andronicus - This was a hard play for me to listen to. I'm glad we didn't have to view a video. I was amazed at how much I picked up just listening to the CD. I didn't enjoy the human sacrifice of Tamora's son in the beginning of the play. I found I didn't like Titus from the get-go, though it make me ponder on the evil and horrific nature of war where it seems really nobody wins. Tamora's underlying plot of revenge was very distasteful also, especially when she helps her other two sons rape and mutilate Lavinia. I would hope, if I was in a similar situation, that I would not take her path of revenge and lose the companionship of the Almighty. I was not sad at the end when she was killed and her body was left for the beasts and birds, although I did feel sorrow for her being in the terrible situation of a prisoner of war to begin with. Titus
Pericles, Prince of Tyre - I also watched the BBC version for this play and really enjoyed it! It was listed as a comedy on the DVD and is listed as a tragedy through LEMI. I, myself, would gravitate toward listing it as a comedy. Although each character, especially Pericles and his daughter, Marina, had much tragedy in their lives, they were both reunited with their wife/mother at the end of the play with much rejoicing. No one was seriously hurt in the play; even Mariana within the Brothel wittingly kept her virtue intact while converting those who would despoil her to goodness and honor. Mariana was obviously raised with the best education and character possible, not in thanks to her envious adopted mother, and I'm glad that education assisted in keeping her pure and undefiled. This play inspired me to seek the higher ground when in dangerous or awkward situations and I found myself hoping that my increasing education will assist me when I am in need.
'Til next time,
Nikki
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
